---In jcs-online@yahoogroups.com,
For Ralph,
That was dispositional rather than positional Ralph, so it is dynamic structure - but that suits us both I suspect. Quite interesting that it could be read as positional in fact, in the context of Higgs, as you say.
[ralphfrost wrote:] Yes, dis-positional. I see that, but, then and now, I rather disregard the prefix. Within the unfolding storyline of higgs within electromagnetic -- nested fields within nested fields -- mass/inertial influences are obviously ~structural -- positional, but as we cast those field influences over into the interactive (higgs) field, and take another look as Heisenberg's uncertainty of position and momentum, we get a slightly clarified view of how come there is the so-called uncertainty. Thus disposition and position rest as nested fields within nested fields -- more nested structured~duality.
Best regards,
Ralph Frost
http://frostscientific.com
With joy you will draw water
from the wells of salvation. Isaiah 12:3
On 31 Mar 2014, at 15:40, <ralph@...>
wrote:
I appreciate your clarification of mass as positional (like energy). Positional has nice structured ring to it.
