I get quizzical looks, sometimes, when I mention "analog math", as if perhaps I may have a few screws loose. I suppose the situation degrades further when I speak or point to a magnetic tetrahedron and/or the five ways to align four magnets along the center-to-vertex lines of a tetrahedron. Of course this spawns the n4, n3s, n2s2, ns3, and s4 primary isomers and we're off and running with the "look and feel" of many biologically significant molecular arrangements and a HUGE fraction of the biosphere. And, of course since one can feel the artifact and the pull and push of of the quantum gravitational fields, the thing gives the right "analog" signals right out of the box. But a fair question still is, "Why tetrahedron?", or "Why magnets?"
Вложенный структурно-дуальность
Anidado ~ Estructurado dualidad
The underlying general principle:
"All things have some structure and
have or exhibit one or more
dualities or differences."
Reality is nested structured~duality.
....
Monday, October 24, 2011
Friday, October 7, 2011
Origin of ~ : the underlying principle of approximate equivalency
Origin of the underlying general principle of approximate equivalency, symbolized as ~ : an alias for the underlying general principle of structured~duality...
Many readers seem to track on the structure or structuring part of the underlying principle of structured~duality, but often, people don't seem to feel comfortable embracing "duality" as a core foundational item (despite ALL the wave-particle, one-half spin attraction-repulsion evidence).
In an effort to seek and explore options (and alter bandwidth) I've been considering abbreviating the term structured~duality just to ~, which would give "the principle of ~". Would that be pronounced "principle of tilde", or simply "principle of squiggle, that is, shift-the key left of 1 on your keyboard".
A search for the ascii value of tilde on Google, beside showing 126, brought up the term "equivalency", and a search on "principle of equivalency" did raise some hits and with the similar principle of equivalence. A search on the full phrase yielded:
Your search - "principle of approximate equivalency" - did not match any documents.
So, it's an option, something for people who see all the underlying inter-transforming multiple-states but who don't necessarily track on thinking of the underlying principle of structured~duality. Yes, it's true, collections of hydrated ions are approximately equivalent with all their transition states and paths and with their pre- and post equilibrium reaction products. It's all multiple-states jumping between multiple-states. Various dances of structural codings.
I believe if one peers into the term "approximate equivalency", it turns out to be a helpful, informative term and a decent alias for ~ and structured~duality.
Think about it.
Many readers seem to track on the structure or structuring part of the underlying principle of structured~duality, but often, people don't seem to feel comfortable embracing "duality" as a core foundational item (despite ALL the wave-particle, one-half spin attraction-repulsion evidence).
In an effort to seek and explore options (and alter bandwidth) I've been considering abbreviating the term structured~duality just to ~, which would give "the principle of ~". Would that be pronounced "principle of tilde", or simply "principle of squiggle, that is, shift-the key left of 1 on your keyboard".
A search for the ascii value of tilde on Google, beside showing 126, brought up the term "equivalency", and a search on "principle of equivalency" did raise some hits and with the similar principle of equivalence. A search on the full phrase yielded:
Your search - "principle of approximate equivalency" - did not match any documents.
So, it's an option, something for people who see all the underlying inter-transforming multiple-states but who don't necessarily track on thinking of the underlying principle of structured~duality. Yes, it's true, collections of hydrated ions are approximately equivalent with all their transition states and paths and with their pre- and post equilibrium reaction products. It's all multiple-states jumping between multiple-states. Various dances of structural codings.
I believe if one peers into the term "approximate equivalency", it turns out to be a helpful, informative term and a decent alias for ~ and structured~duality.
Think about it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)