Nice job on presenting one, or of resurrecting your complicated abstract math echo of nested structural coding. It doesn't seem naive to me and I hope you can remember it. For abstract math aficionados who presently think backwards and inside-out (from the analog math perspective) such a translation may be of considerable significance, helping to catch some of those men in the net.
The so-called 1D - 3D characterizations and numbers of degrees of freedom and topological constraints (relating to properties), though, are just a rather old-world way way of thinking about, pointing at and attempting to simplify our actual reality of nested fields within nested fields. Interactions occur within containments -- ~many ~body interactions... Ditto, old-world (but very, very helpful) for the various named abstract math features such as Riemann zeta function, braids, knots and eigenstates.
Prime knots of ‘subjective accompaniments of complex energy eigenstates’ is still a rather lofty and, I think, disconnected obfuscation of attraction and repulsion in stacks and sequences of the underlying, and in one view, the 6^n, 10^20 per second internal analog math. Might you be trying to point at knots of 'prime feelings'?
There are knots on many levels. Glibly, these may be seen in the respirational water layer, bound water-protein matrices, xRNA, genetics and epi-genetics, perhaps in the synaptics and up through protein-folding into the tenuous standing waves in our functional and dysfunctional inter-personal and group dynamics, whether archetypally influenced or not.
