---In jcs-online@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
...snip...
Yes, somebody may think that we can account for consciousness only within the limits of Modern Physics. But what to do with others who are confident that to account for consciousness we have to construct a Science of Consciousness first hand? Do these people have their right for existence and a place where they could be able to exchange ideas?
.
With respect,
Serge Patlavskiy
Yes, somebody may think that we can account for consciousness only within the limits of Modern Physics. But what to do with others who are confident that to account for consciousness we have to construct a Science of Consciousness first hand? Do these people have their right for existence and a place where they could be able to exchange ideas?
.
With respect,
Serge Patlavskiy
Serge,
The issue is, before the paradigm transition in science, things pretty much look as presently: disjointed, confused, paradoxical, split, incoherent, contradictory, etc.
After the paradigm transition in science, the perspective is different and folks don't necessarily have to whine and squabble about physical versus non-physical. Think of it more like another adjustment akin to Copernicus making an appropriate adjustment in nesting level.
Then, soon in the near-Earth future, when folks really start to track on making just the one simple shift to analog math, all mediated via interactive, hands-on tactile "measurements/perturbations" (aka, experimental proof), then there is this HUGE unfolding physical intuition where, nested multiple states literally and figuratively spring from the simple analog math to yield reality as nested structured~duality -- reality as nested fields within nested fields.
Running the ~same analog math in the structural coding of our respiration and metabolics is all frosting on the cake. It's cool, undeniable. We get to remember that we first learned to read unsilently and then were cautioned to read silently and not continue to outwardly protein-fold our lips.
So, after the paradigm transition in science we have new ~physical science AND a new science of consciousness. Both, though, are more nested structural coding, more nested structured~duality..
Do you get the picture?
Best regards,
Ralph Frost
Paradigm Transition Support
[fSci] -- Frost Scientific
http://frostscientific.com
http://structuredduality.blogspot.com
With joy you will draw water
from the wells of salvation. Isaiah 12:3
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment