(12/3/2019 "Reply to your forum post" -- Scientific Basis of Consciousness group)
Ram,
That's a good question. I guess I consider it (reality) as universe+theories+errors+ incompletions+other_items/ concerns/influences.
I'd say it includes more than just 'universe' and "originally" I think I
started out considering "both the physical and the 'mental' aspects of
reality". Later I think I realized that in seeing "reality as nested
structured~duality, which includes physical and mental aspects", that I
was pre-conditioned in the dominant western scientific paradigm to think
in terms of the supposedly two categories: physical and mental... (or
alternatives), but in the emerging more unified model, at the underlying
principle level there is just the nested structured~duality
"supporting both". Thus, reality is nested structured~duality. From
there, or prior to, we acquire the "magnetic tetrahedral/polyhedral
analog math" and that prompts for nested fields within nested fields and
nested structural coding.
The pattern seems similar, to me, relating to the <'Chit-Padartha: Conscious-Matter'> in that if/when one "looks inside" that, (according to me) it's the same thing -- more nested structured~duality.
...As a quick and dirty very general approximation.
Does
that help or answer your question? You do understand that anyone who
re-defines reality is typically considered psychotic, don't you?
How do you define 'reality', Ram?
Best regards,
--Ralph
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment