past ____________^___________future
but which Young points out the event, for instance, the Civil War, is actually a change of state:
past________+------------------future
more like where there is stepwise change of state. Elegant of him, huh?
No doubt Young may have already fully developed the notion elsewhere in other of his works, I'll keep reading, but intuitively, the proverbial classical "cause and effect" mantra fits nicely into the same sort of pattern as "an event inducing a change of state".
This vague chatter of words and ASCII art, to me, paints a wonderful watercolor showing how the classical and the relativistic approximations both boil down, conceptually, to be supported by the one single internal multiple-state analog math. Young and others might term it the quantum change and they certainly may be right. In the model and trial theory I advocate, however, I view the fundamental as all of reality being nested structured duality. I represent it in unfamiliar but easy to learn analog math in the form of repulsively balanced forms of the five ways to align four rod magnets along the radii of a tetrahedron --magnetic tetrahedra -- aka, the multiple-state pattern of the multiple-state patterns forming most of our various sp3-hybridized molecular components. This imagery quickly gets us thinking (and feeling) in terms of haptically valid structural coding. (For static, crude images, consider: http://magtet.com/images/phpshow.php )
Have a blessed Easter. Christ is risen.
R. Frost
Powered by Qumana
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment